Role ethics values corporate culture pdf

Furthermore, when you cover a topic regularly in training, you drive home its critical importance. Repeated conversations and training about ethics and compliance reinforces that your company takes them both seriously. Plus, the more you talk about ethics and compliance and train to their related policies, you are regularly equipping employees with the tools they need to act in specific situations. If you are truly interested in changing your corporate culture, your ethics and compliance efforts should not be a one-and-done approach.

And, perhaps most importantly, your motivation for change needs to be about more than covering your bases or reducing liability. Related Article. Most Read. How does your organization compare? Get your copy today. More info. Law Enforcement Over 3, law enforcement agencies across the United States use PowerDMS to increase efficiency, reduce costs, and promote accountability.

Learn More. Healthcare Healthcare facilities across the nation use PowerDMS to achieve everyday survey readiness and to deliver safe, quality services. Featured Resources. Blog An extensive library of policy management resources, at your fingertips.

Read More. Download Now. Take a Tour Get Demo. Start Tour. Article highlights The difference between ethics and compliance. The importance of ethics in corporate culture. Creating a culture of ethics and compliance. While they certainly both strive to achieve similar goals, they are not quite the same thing.

Difference Between Ethics and Compliance. Importance of Ethics in Corporate Culture. In other words, they need to control the activities of the employees.

This can be achieved in a couple of ways. The traditional way included using formalized rules, i. While this method has its merits, the s saw corporate culture starting to be used to enhance managerial control.

Because members of an organization should have a shared sense of purpose and meanings, the corporate culture could enhance effectiveness in the organization directly [16]. As has already been established, organizational culture can explain both unethical behavior within the organization as well as ethical actions.

Through a skilled and diligent management, the unethical behavior can be altered into a more ethical one. The first approach is that of creating a unitary corporate culture around core ethical values. These kinds of organizations fit the description of the culture of character, with organizational values and norms being shared by all members of the organization not just the leaders , believing in the norms and following them, regardless of the geographical or departmental divisions.

This approach argues that management can and should manage the organizational culture actively [16]. Therefore, it will only be presented in brief here. In the first place, the organization must determine the commonly-held moral beliefs and values of the members of the organization and codify them.

The end result is the corporate strategy, philosophy, mission and, most importantly for this article, the code of ethics. The code of ethics should be posted in prominent places to serve as a constant reminder about the values the organization has adopted [6]. Research indicates that code is effective only if it is linked to its communication including external stakeholders and is enforced within the organization [17]. One way it can be communicated is through ethics training.

Although it may seem redundant to review the code of ethics, there might be ideological differences between the leaders of the organization and other employees [2]. Furthermore, providing ethical training to employees indirectly communicates that ethical behavior is valued and needs to be considered in decision-making [3, 11]. In this first case, it means hiring and promoting ethical people. Collecting like-minded employees should strengthen the unitary culture and promote ethics more.

The next aspect of these mechanisms is an ethics program. These programs can be designed in two different ways: a values-based approach rewards and encourages ethical behavior and a compliance-based approach detects, prevents and punishes breaches of rules.

Since both of these variable positively influence motivation, developing an ethical culture where such behavior is rewarded can have a positive impact on employee behavior [6]. However, both punishments as well as rewards are needed. In any case, management should confirm the organizational values that result in sustainable ethical practices and high ethical standards. This is based on a multilevel model of ethical leadership.

In the first place, the leaders must embed shared values through their influence on the ethical culture of units at various levels of the organization [13]. In other words, the business leader needs to lead by example. This may be the best ethical training members can get. The leader must reinforce in word and deed the values of the organization.

If there is no visible commitment by the senior leader of the organization, ethics programs may lack credibility among members of the organization especially among senior management, whose commitment to ethical culture is critical. In conclusion, leadership behaviors that support ethical behavior will lead to the development of an ethically oriented culture Furthermore, the above-mentioned factors are enhanced by and also form the foundation for a transformational leader.

According to Carlson and Perrewe , transformational leadership may just be the best approach for implementing ethical behavior in organizations and establishing an ethical organizational culture [3]. Transformational leadership refers to the process of influencing important changes in employee attitudes so they can internalize the vision of the leader and the organizational goals. The outcome of which can be a dramatic change in the organization's culture.

In this way, employees may no longer seek merely self- interest, but do what is beneficial to the organization as a whole [3]. While the cascading effect of positive ethical values can occur passively, leaders may also seek out subordinates who already have ethical values ingrained in themselves to serve as models, and then work to shape and reinforce these values actively in others in order for the values to be accepted throughout the organization. However, it may be difficult to influence the culture to achieve corporate goals.

In contrast to the first approach, the subcultural approach recognizes and encourages diversity within the organization. The differences could be national, racial, ethnic, professional, occupational, etc.

Instead of trying to create one unified culture, it attempts to understand the value differences of the subcultures. Unlike in the first approach, it doubts whether management can or even should directly control organizational culture to accomplish organizational goals.

Research indicates that the repository of organizational values and norms is more likely to come from the subcultures of an organization than the corporate culture [16]. The values gained from the subcultures may be longer lasting and more significantly influence employee behavior. In other words, management should relinquish power to the subcultures. The result should be that commitment can be nourished and communally-mediated control can be increased [16]. As an added benefit, it prevents groupthink and simply maintaining the status quo, and also serves as a watchdog over members of the organization who have privileged positions.

Implementation of this approach is more difficult than the first one. By indentifying controversial areas, they can develop points of consensus or a cohesion profile. While different subcultures may have different ideas on how to achieve the corporate goals, they may still share the common values and the desire to achieve them. Identifying the common core values, therefore, can serve as a benchmark against which management can evaluate operating norms.

Finally, this approach requires the devotion of considerable resources to determine how subcultural practices and norms are to be reconciled without compromising core values and ethics [16].

As can be seen, this approach does not impose a single corporate culture. It attempts to use the values of the subcultures to stimulate more ethically-aware behavior. The subcultural approach avoids imposing standards; instead, it encourages the individual processes of self-inspection, critique and debate. This debate, however, occurs in a broadly managed framework [16]. Conclusion Ethical issues have posed major challenges to companies in recent years and there will undoubtedly be more in the future.

Good ethical practices may not be easy to maintain. However, with a well-designed ethics policy, ethical leadership and implementing ethics into organizational strategies and processes, it will make it easier [4]. The reason is because these factors are incorporated into the organizational culture. How might a culture of character be developed? It is certainly by intention. It is the responsibility of particular individuals within the organization, i.

Strong leaders model and pass on ethical aspects of the culture and use techniques like structure, decision-making processes, rewards, norms, heroes, stories, rituals and other artifacts to create a strong culture. This is the foundation for creating a culture of character, where members of the organization "know what is right, value what is right, and do what is right. Benefits of ethical behavior have been established. Furthermore, methods for managing organizational culture to enhance ethics have been explored and suggestions for creating an ethical organizational culture have been briefly presented.

In all cases, management must be committed to ethical conduct. To conclude, despite the economic crisis, there are clear and long-lasting advantages of establishing an ethical culture.

With a more open and ethical organizational culture, the more positively employees tend to commit to corporate social responsibility and this will generate more honest environments. As a consequence, this may not only reduce the unhealthy environment that began the financial crisis, but will also help in restoring the health of the financial system that caused it.

Ethical leadership: Keeping values in business cultures. In Business and Management Review. ISSN: - Organizational ethics training: A proactive perspective. In The Journal for Quality Participation. ISSN: Institutionalization of organizational ethics through transformational leadership. In Journal of Business Ethics.

CHAN, A. Cultural dimensions, ethical sensitivity, and corporate governance. Core ideologies. Motivating employees to act ethically: An expectancy theory approach. Leadership and organizational culture: Linking CEO characteristics to cultural values. Ethics typically are a large part of a company culture. To make the connection between its culture and ethics prevalent, a company can create a mission statement with a direct reference to ethics.

Companies must then assess business activities through the prism of its ethical code to determine the effectiveness of the corporate culture.

Ethics can be a difficult concept to define in business. In many ways, they will have a different definition to different individuals. For example, adding morals to an ethical code of conduct is possible under certain scenarios. A significant reason to link corporate culture and ethics is to ensure the same definition and understanding of ethics among a group of people.

It dictates how a company should act and react to both internal and external parties.